Friends Can’t Let Friends Vote Republican

I believe I mentioned before that I’m celebrating my release from academic administration by trying to read a library.  I’ve been focusing on recent books, and I’m on a mini-run of political books.  In that context I’ve recently finished Chris Hayes Twilight of the Elites — I have some nitpicks, but much more admiration, and I hope to blog about it soon; Christopher Hedges and Joe Sacco’s Days of Destruction, Days of Revolt — again some disagreement, but a must read nontheless.

Along the way I’ve been looking at some books calculated to raise my blood pressure in other ways — Ross Douthat’s Bad Religion — which I found to be not really worth bothering to argue with (such an embarassing display of poor historiography)! I’ve also  been dipping into Charles Murray’s Coming Apart, which combines an insight he shares with Hayes and a commitment to a prior conclusion that drives his core argument spectacularly off target.*  Still, it’s useful to get some sense of how the other side thinks and argues.

I do hope — I’d say plan, but I’ve learned how regularly day job stuff rises to intervene — to blog about at least some of these down the road. But I’ve just started the next book in the programme, Thomas E. Man and Norman J. Ornstein’s It’s Even Worse Than It Looks. 

Right away — in the introduction — I came across a paragraph that sums up, in the most economical form yet, what’s really at stake 100 days from now.  So let me turn this post over to them, and let y’all draw the obvious inference about what to do between now and November 6:

The second [of two sources of dysfunction in current American politics] is the fact that, however awkward it may be for the traditional press and nonpartisan analysts to acknowledge, one of the two major parties, the Republican Party, has become an insurgent outlier — ideologically extreme; contemptuous of the inherited social and economic policy regime; scornful of compromise; unpersuaded by conventional understanding of facts, evidence, and science; and dismissive of the legitimacy  of its political opposition.  When one party moves this far from the center of American politics, it is extremely difficult to enact policies responsive to the country’s most pressing challenges.

I’d quibble with only a couple of words there.

I’d say the party has moved fromright of American politics over the last decade.  It took off from  the center in 1980 or so.  And “extremely difficult?”  Try, on the evidence that Mann and Ornstein go on to present in their first chapter (as far as I’ve gotten), “impossible.”

As I say.  Quibbles.  As a matter of sense, this is right on — made the more potent given who writes it: not a DFH like yours truly, but truly seasoned, deeply centrist, long term observers of the institutions of American politics.

More to the point:  there is no such thing as a good Republican candidate anymore, at any level.  Your city councilmember, your state rep., your congressional representative as individuals could be reasonable, smart, caring, trying to reform this failed party from within.  Mitt Romney himself may seem to the more credulous among our media elite to be a more thoughtful and moderate man than he is a candidate. (If you are truly credulous, or simply a hack, you may even bet on Romney’s “secret plan” to fix the economy.)

None of that matters.  “Good” Republicans are mere useful idiots, providing scraps of cover for the radical authoritarians wielding the real power.  The party is committed to public policy stance that is destructive, both of American prospects and those of folks all around the world.  They must be driven so far from the political arena as to be destroyed, until whatever emerges from its wreckage, even if it persists in operating under the label “Republican” is utterly transformed from the catastrophic clown show we now watch in horror.

Factio Grandaeva Delenda Est.

Oh — and one last thing.   There are, I know, lots of flaws one can point to in the Obama administration.  There are plenty of warts on the Congressional Democratic caucus.  But the two parties are not the same and the consequences of getting it wrong this time are simply huge.  The politics of purity may be satisfying, but this time around such delicate sensibilities are a luxury we simply cannot afford.

And a very cheerful Sunday to you too.

*That would be — in cartoon form — his understanding of the way elites and the rest of (white) us now exist in geographical and social isolation, joined to his libertarian mandated conclusion that the obstacle to lower class advance is a cultural rather than a political or economic issue.  And while from within the assumptions of his project I can follow his argument as to why he focuses solely on white America, reading of Hedges and Sacco, for one example, makes it clear how doing is part of what allows Murray to ignore the ways in which can’t account for the economic and social outcomes he seeks to explain

Image: Thomas Cole: The Course of Empire: Desolation, 1836.

Explore posts in the same categories: good books, Massive Fail, Republican knavery, Romney

Tags: ,

You can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.

16 Comments on “Friends Can’t Let Friends Vote Republican”

  1. Doug Husen Says:

    What a tragic opinion you have embraced that mis-characterizes Republicans and their deals. Wish you were better informed or honest.

    • Tom Says:

      Facts actually matter. Read Mann and Ornstein and come back. Until then, you’re no better than a bot.

    • Dan Uhl Says:

      How much more effective would your criticism be, if you could find an example or two? Since you can’t be bothered to construct an actual, factual criticism, your little snit can be safely discarded, in the ash-bin of sloppy intellectualism.

      • Sidney Says:

        Maybe Doug will stop waving his “don’t tread on me” flag when he and his fellow patriots are making $3.00/hr and living under our crumbling bridges with their uneducated, hungry children while listening to their “leaders” in Washington proudly exclaim that the USA is the wealthiest country on the globe. Maybe then, they will realize that they were played for dupes. Then again, maybe not.


  2. Oh bullshit. You call yourself a Christian but you support a party of amoral Social Darwinists who believe that any succor to the poor is wrong, that the richer you are, the more god loves you.

    That’s not the path Jesus walked.

    • Doug Husen Says:

      You seem to know alot about me. Lol. And again, you have now mis-characterized me. I expect a little more.

      I have no trouble with what Jesus said “render to Cesar what is Cesar’s and to God what is God’s.” And I do not ascribe (in general) to liberals… ill intentions, only in-effective policies and a little hypocrisy sprinkled on top.

      • Dan Uhl Says:

        Again you offer no substantive argument. That’s one thing that I find sad about present day conservatives. They cannot construct a cogent argument, even if their life depended on it.

      • Mark Says:

        Doug Husen continues to prove that he is just a word salad ‘bot’, the understanding of a fourth grader and a planetary disgrace.


      • Here’s what little I know about you. You came here and wrote a comment supporting the party of amoral Social Darwinists. Your ID linked back to a Christian site.

        The contradiction between the two is obvious. Seems you’re the hypocrite. I wonder whether defenders of rich men will have as much trouble as camels passing through the eye of a needle.

    • Sidney Says:

      Lovable, if you would like to understand how the rightwing squares the circle, there is a wonderful free online book written by a retired professor of psychology Robert Altemeyer.

      Theauthoritarians.com

      It will answer all your questions about how they think and why they do and say the things they do.


  3. […] About Fracking A Washington reporter’s review of Barofsky’s book is unintentionally revealing Friends Can’t Let Friends Vote Republican On Algebra, High Expectations, and the Common Core Inkblot: the original LOL Cat If it […]


  4. Wonderful blog, Might I also point the finger at our institutions by sharing Chris Hedges insightful and depressing tome: “The Death of the Liberal Class”. Keep-up the great work.
    Cheers,
    Walter
    (my old company, BTW was incorporated as “Inverse Square Systems”…unrelated field, very related philosophy!)

  5. Richard Ackerman Says:

    Ah ” word salad bot” touché. Romney and the rest of the Washington Repubstipation have nothing to offer, and can’t even argue legitimately for their own cause.
    Another Inverse Square Systems alumni.


  6. We could drink to Dressage, maybe pick-up a few mil in deductions!

  7. Tom Says:

    Can I say how much I’m enjoying this thread.

    Thanks, all


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: