Live Blogging President Obama’s Energy Address At MIT
Star studded crowd. Gov. Patrick, Sen. Kerry, and local congressman Mike Capuano are here.
12:45: Obama takes the podium. Wild applause. This is Obama country.
First words: Thank you MIT!
In joke: “I’ll be here a while. I understand a bunch of engineering students have put my motorcade on top of Building Ten.
12:49: Politician shout outs are now over. Now the president is touting all the lovely things being done at the MIT Energy Initiative (MITEI). Makes the link to the notion of Americans as innovators willing to take risks on projects that might fail — and on the US as a place willing to support such efforts.
References Lincoln’s move during the Civil War to establish Land Grant Colleges; Roosevelt’s signing of the GI bill; after Sputnik, US invests in space technology….
So, the claim is being made that we have always been about innovation; that ambition is “in our DNA” — a phrase I understand and loathe.
But now — the economic challenges are huge. “Economy in which we all share opportunity is one in which we all share crisis.” Said in context of globalized economy.
Says: Energy that powers our economy also undreminse our security and threatens our planet”
12:53 Nation that gets to clean energy wins the next economic revolution “I want America to be that nation.” (applause)
That’s why, he says, the stimulus act has more clean energy funding than ever appropriated before…summarizes what the 89 billion bucks in the stimulus packae will go to fund.
Talks about a Massachusetts project — a test facility for wind turbine blades. It is notable that Obama so readily digs at least one layer down into the technical details; its a rhetorically powerful way to claim not just support for a good cause, but the real value of that cause, the notion that we are spending cash on things that matter. Smart guy, I’ve heard.
Many props to Governor Patrick — local Mass politics are a subtext here.
12:59: Pivot to the comprehensive legislation we need and discussing the implications of Kerry’s climate change bill. Mentions cleaner fossil fuels; biofuels, nuclear, wind, waves and sun.
Saying that there is a long, planned, intelligible path from an economy powered by fossil fuel dependence/carbon pollution threats to one that is sustainable; not making the claim that we can get there in one swoop.
Talks about DOD and business leaders and others coming round to the notion that global warming and dependence on fossil fuels is a national security and economic threat…making the case for the necessity, not merely the desirability of action.
Again, it’s an interesting strategy rhetorically; it seems to me that he is working hard to box in opponents to a smaller and less defensible position. I hope it works.
He says explicitly that the opponents are being marginalized — but that they will fight harder as we get closer to a bill.
“They will say that we are destroying our eocnomy…when it is”what we got now that’s threatening it.
“We’re going to have to work on those folks. But there is a more dangerous myth — because we are all complicit in it.”
That there is nothing we can do “it’s pessimism” …that politics are broken etc…
1:01: That implies we can’t solve problems any more, says POTUS, and he knows that can’t be true….we’ve seen it at MIT and elsewhere…we’ve done it before (electricity) etc.
Writing teacher here. This is an ugly phrase: of innovators “they will lead us in the future as they have done so in the past.”
Can’t quite get my head around that one.
Ends with a pep paragraph…we can do this…we’re Americans, and we’re damn good at this kind of thing.
Last thoughts from your blogger:
He’s a good speaker, which we knew. He’s smart as hell, which we also knew. He’s a political process man. This had no new initiatives or proposals in it, nor even a central, strong outline of how the specific actions discussed add up to the path to a sustainable energy future some decades out.
Rather, this speech seemed more or less to lay down a marker: we’ve got some things going…we need now to pass the next piece of legislation — Kerry’s cap and trade plus other stuff bill is the one the President specifically referenced, along with the House bill already passed.
The praise for the various specific projects and research initiatives were designed to answer critics who say that we can’t escape fossil fuel use Most of the speech by running time was devoted to various general and specific paeans to the capacity of Americans to get this part of the job done.
Given that everybody, and especially me, are critics, here’s what I thought the speeh missed most: I wanted to hear in this context a real and dire description of what failure here would mean, not just for the environment, but for the economy and safety of US citizens en masse and individually.
That is — I think it’s pretty well established that projecting the dire consquences of a 4 degree warming is still a hard thing to grasp (though this map is a good place to start). But if you talk about the cost of wars, or even merely of the budget year over year for Centcom…if you talk about clean energy jobs lost to other nations even now (see e.g. this story on the Chinese vs. American economic edge in solar energy products.)…if you talk about the lives lost here at home through the pollution being caused now by our current energy use pattern (18,o00 a year according to this report, about the same number as homicides for the last year I could pull the data quickly. (See this CDC fact sheet and click through to the PDF listed as the source for the summary numbers.)…if you go after the harm we suffer now through our dependence on our current energy mix, then the urgency for change and the willingness to assume risk in the service of that change will go up.
To be fair: he did very clearly make the case that powerful interests in this area, like DOD, understand the implications of inaction and now favor significant energy policy change. But he didn’t bring the reasons why home and down to the you and me level as sharply as I would have liked.
President Obama has the best pulpit in the world to preach this. He has the right temperament too, by which I mean not his famous cool, but his genuine optimism, his sense that no problem is too hard for us to tackle. That side of him was on display in full measure today, and I liked it. But I think he needs to light more of a fire under us (sorry) on the other side, to remind us the most dangerous option we have right now is to stand pat.
And that’s my $.02