Quote for the Day: Jacob Burckhardt hearts him some science writing dept.
Jacob Burckhardt is hardly a household name anymore, outside certain rather specialized houses, but it would be not too great an exaggeration to say that he “discovered” the Italian Renaissance, establishing the notion of a distinct period, a time and place in which fundamental changes took place that rung out the end of the ideas and culture of the middle ages, laying the foundations of for habits of mind and the concrete history of that time we think of as modern.
Perhaps most significantly, he was an early historian, perhaps the seminal one, who focused on the history of art in particular and “culture” more generally as essential approachs to “history,” full stop. That attitude led him to think about the history of science in the Renaissance as something other than simply a chain of discoveries that form individual sequences within particular disciplines…which in turn led him to just about the earliest praise of science writing I’ve been able to find.
If it is a little back-handed, Burkhardt’s compliment still captures what I think of as a critical truth: science is not self-contained; it is an expression of culture, and its survival as a living human enterprise depends on culture at large remaining aware of its claim on the public’s understanding and emotion alike. In his landmark work, The Civilization of the Renaissance, Burkhardt writes:
Even the simple dilletante of a science — if in the present case we should assign to Aeneas Sylvius so low a rank — can diffuse just that sort of general interest in the subject which prepares for new pioneers the indispensable groundwork of a favourable predisposition in the public mind. True discoveres in any science know well what they owe to such mediation.
(Part Four. The translation above comes from the Penguin Classics edition of 1990.)
I’d argue that science writing and science writers have more ambition than simply acting as cultural diffusers. The ones I admire most think of themselves as writers whose subject is science, and not simply science writers; that is they (and I, in the privacy of my own thoughts) are trying to use language to the limits of capacity for expression, to move readers and not simply to inform them. That said, Burkhardt is right: a civilized culture, a civilized time manages to communicate some version of its most sophisticated thinking to every interested citizen.big ideas, good public communication of science, good writing, History, History of Science, science writing comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.